The Vibe from Social Media. Fresh Daily.

Dismay as SCOTUS Declines to Hear LGBTQ Case

Follow this vibe using Facebook
from on
xxx% positive yyyyyy opinions

Enter topics to compare.

To look for topics that are discussed together, separate by commas.
e.g. ford, mustang, tires

Main topic(s):
Compare with:


Select the time period for this vibe

All time periods end with today's opinion. The trend view must be at least 3 days.

30 days
14 days
7 days
3 days

Take this opinion and...
Like it
Send it
Share it
Short URL:

Put the Internet's Opinion on your site.

Copy the embed code to the clipboard and paste into your blog or web site.

Use live data.
The widget will update to the current date each time it's viewed
Lock to today's date.
The widget will always display as you see it today

By copying this code, I agree to the 30dB, Inc. terms and conditions

Dismay as SCOTUS Declines to Hear LGBTQ Case research shows that when social media discusses Supreme Court and Lgbt, people used these words: . Based on our research, see the crowd's opinion and sentiment on Supreme Court and Lgbt . The data was collected from samples of comments made on the Internet through 01/08/2018. You can intereact with the polling data and see actual excerpts of opinions we've gathered.Use the search box to enter topics, terms, and/or names to see the latest trends and opinion polls on news, sports, politics, entertainment, celebrities, hashtags, products, electronics and more. Opinion polls are updated several times every day on every topic.

Sentiment terms and topics that are combined with Supreme Court and Lgbtmore
Add your opinion on Supreme Court and Lgbt:
Your Email: 
Your Opinion:

Follow this as it updates: We'll email you when there's a change in the vibe!
Your Name:
Your Email: 
A controversial “religious freedom” law in Mississippi will remain on the books for the foreseeable future after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a case challenging it. The 2016 law gives government employees and private businesses the right to discriminate against LGBTQ people on the basis of “sincerely held” religious beliefs, which are defined in the bill as, “Marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman ... sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage,” and “male (man) or female (woman) refer to an individual's immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics at time of birth.” The problem for the plaintiffs who brought the case opposing the law is that they did so before it was enacted, which they hoped would lead to it being struck down prior to it having any tangible, negative effect on LGBTQ individuals. Instead, lower courts ruled that the plaintiffs had no standing to challenge the law because it was impossible to prove its discriminatory effects before it was actually in place. SCOTUS didn’t explain its reasoning for not taking the case, though it likely used the same logic. A slew of new challenges could make their way back to the Supreme Court, and there may eventually be a decision on the constitutionality of this latest religious freedom argument. Still, Social is annoyed: Over the last 90 days, “LGBT + Supreme Court” has a 37 percent positive score. –Alex Shultz

A Sampling of Opinions
A Sampling of Opinions
More Opinions